Legal Opinion

Marzec v. DeBuono

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 2000PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

The issue here is whether Medicaid regulations governing eligibility for benefits authorized a reduction in the applicant’s income in an amount necessary to meet the needs of his ineligible spouse. The Appellate Division answered in the affirmative. For reasons stated in this Opinion, we now reverse.

On October 1, 1996, petitioner Raymond Marzec applied for Medicaid benefits to the Erie County Department of Social Services (“DSS”). At that time petitioner’s gross income, derived solely from Social Security, was $717 per month. Thereafter, petitioner was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Sigety v. IngrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Seittelman v. SabolNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Cortlandt Nursing Care Center v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Glosenger v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Elcor Health Services, Inc. v. NovelloNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. County of St. Lawrence v. DainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Town of Webster v. Village of WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Elcor Health Services, Inc. v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Gignac v. PatersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API