Seittelman v. Sabol
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether defendants by regulation may limit Medicaid reimbursement for expenses incurred by eligible individuals during the three-month period preceding the application for Medicaid to only those services rendered by Medicaid-enrolled providers. We hold that such a State regulatory limitation is unsupported by the language or policy of the Federal statute. It is neither rational nor reasonable and is thus unenforceable. We also hold that the recipients may be reimbursed only at the Medicaid rate in existence at the time…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Perales v. KriegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Marzec v. DeBuonoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Jansen Court Homeowners Ass'n v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- KSLM-Columbus Apartments, Inc. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Schott v. OlszewskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.