Legal Opinion
Glosenger v. Perales
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 5, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by dismissing the petition in its entirety and, as so modified, affirmed.
Petitioner, age 60 and disabled, had monthly income in 1991 of $763.80, consisting primarily of SSI disability benefits. Petitioner’s income was the sole means of support for himself and his wife, then 58 years old and not disabled, who had no income of her own. Petitioner also received Medicaid coverage; his monthly income less applicable disregards — $710.90—fell below the Medicaid eligibility standard for a two-person…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atkins v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MATTER OF LEE v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Jones v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Jones v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marzec v. DeBuonoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Mistrick v. Division of Medical Assistance & Health ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Blair v. NovelloNew York Supreme Court · 2008