Sharp v. Wyckoff
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Bill to foreclose. On final- hearing on pleadings and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The defence in this case is that on the 4th of April, 1884, before the bill was filed, and after the mortgage was due, Mrs.. Wyckoff, the owner of the mortgaged premises, by Fisher Pidcock as her agent for the purpose, tendered the complainant the amount then due on the mortgage in payment thereof, and that the latter refused to accept the money. It is proved that the tender was duly made, and that it was refused by the complainant. After the refusal, and on the same day, the money was deposited in the Clinton bank, where it remained until the next day after the bill was filed,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Caldwell v. CassidyNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Cogan v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Waldron v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Myers v. ByingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Commonwealth v. CrevorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1810
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Amster v. TenneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947