Legal Opinion

Woodburn v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1947No. 7008PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Commission denying compensation to the plaintiff.

The facts out of which the controversy arose are as follows : The plaintiff testified without contradiction that he was 55 years of age, was by occupation a structural iron worker and rigger, but for several years before the incident involved in this case his work had been largely that of supervising. As a supervisor he had little occasion to engage in heavy manual work nor had he worked at high altitudes. He was employed on July 16, 1945, by the defendant Ora Bundy Company as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kavalinakis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kent v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Hammond v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Robertson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Thomas D. Dee Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. California Packing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Sizemore v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, & Helpers, Locals No. 222 & 976 of International Brotherhood v. Orange Transportation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Skelton v. LeesUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Harrison v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API