Legal Opinion
Martin v. Choudhuri
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 5, 1983No. 82-C-931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHABAZ, District Judge.
This is an action for medical malpractice. Plaintiff Mary Martin alleges that she suffered damages resulting from a negligent failure to diagnose and treat a cervical infection. Plaintiff names B.P. Choudhuri, M.D. and the Patients Compensation Fund as defendants.
Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that this Court lacks jurisdiction over defendant Patients Compensation Fund (Fund). As a result, defendants contend, the claims against defendant Choudhuri should be dismissed, pursuant to 19(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As it…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fuchilla v. LaymanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Dutta v. ToddDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Fuchilla v. LaymanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988