Legal Opinion
Fuchilla v. Layman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 8, 1988Published
1Opinion of the Court
109 N.J. 319 (1988)
537 A.2d 652
ANNE FUCHILLA, RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM A. LAYMAN, M.D.; UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 30, 1987.
Decided February 8, 1988.
Barbara A. Harned, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued the cause for appellants (W. Cary Edwards, Atty. Gen. of New Jersey, attorney; Andrea M. Silkowitz, Deputy Atty. Gen., of counsel).
Maureen S. Binetti argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman, & Spitzer, attorneys; James M. Burns, of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited102 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.