Legal Opinion

Stine v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 26, 1929No. 8065PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

This is a -writ of error from a conviction for selling intoxicants in violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA).

Three matters are argued here, to wit: (1) That the information does not charge an offense; (2) that there was failure of proof of the offense charged; (3) that there wore errors in the charge to the jury.

I. The information was in two counts, charging sale and possession respectively. At the pronouncement of sentence and before entry of judgment, the court, of its own motion, dismissed the second count (for possession) and sentenced on the first count…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Bennett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Mathews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Maresca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  5. Farley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. McParlinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  2. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Voelkle v. SisemoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Commercial Discount Co. v. Midwest Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. United States v. FrenchDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API