Legal Opinion

Commercial Discount Co. v. Midwest Chevrolet Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1956No. 37222PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Justice.

Commercial Discount Company instituted this action in the Court of Common Pleas of Tulsa County against Midwest Chevrolet Company for recovery of possession, as mortgagee, of a 1949 Chevrolet automobile, or for its value in the sum of $325 in the event its return cannot be had, and for an attorney’s fee in the sum of $125.

The automobile was taken under a writ of replevin and delivered to plaintiff. The defendant, Midwest Chevrolet Company, filed an answer denying that plaintiff had a first and prior lien on the automobile and denied the right of plaintiff to recover an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Owen v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Rogers County Bank v. CullisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Orr v. MallonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Continental Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. Henry v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ivey v. Henry's Diesel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Voelkle v. SisemoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Travis v. Del State BankDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
  4. HSRE-PEP I, LLC v. HSRE-PEP Crimson Park LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. Oklahoma State Bank of Ada v. Citizens Bank of AdaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API