Legal Opinion

Voelkle v. Sisemore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 1959No. 38237PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This is the second appeal to this court arising out of the Tulsa County District Court’s Cause No. 87677. The first one is reported as Sisemore v. Voelkle, Okl., 312 P.2d 922. As may be seen from the cited report, the action was instituted by plaintiffs in error, who appear therein, and will be referred to herein, as plaintiffs. Plaintiffs’ causes of action were based upon a promissory note, executed and delivered to them by Tulsa Acreage Inc., for $55,000, said figure being the purchase price of certain real estate said promisor had contracted to purchase from plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Security State Bank of Comanche v. W. R. Johnston & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Orr v. MallonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Continental Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  4. Henry v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Commercial Discount Co. v. Midwest Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. ApplebySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Ivey v. Henry's Diesel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Travis v. Del State BankDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. ApplebySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. HSRE-PEP I, LLC v. HSRE-PEP Crimson Park LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API