Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Summers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1986No. 84-648PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a co-employee lawsuit. Anna Jean Summers was employed by Avondale Mills in Stevenson, Alabama, as a “spinner.” Mrs. Summers was responsible for the operation of three spinning frames. In the spinning department, yarn is wound on bobbins in a spinning frame. There are three frames running simultaneously. Each frame contains 88 bobbins. The yarn is brought to the area in large cans and is run from the cans upwards over the walkway and connected to the bobbin. The bobbins are set in a ring and the yarn is wound onto the bobbin, guided by a “traveler.” The rings on the spinning frames are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Culver v. Slater Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Brodie v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Edward J. Russell v. City of WildwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Procter & Gamble Co. v. StaplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Procter & Gamble Co. v. StaplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Procter & Gamble Co. v. StaplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API