Procter & Gamble Co. v. Staples
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
Plaintiff’s decedent was killed in an industrial accident involving a finishing line compactor operated on the premises of his employer, Buckeye Cellulose Corporation (“Buckeye”), a separately incorporated, wholly owned subsidiary of Procter & Gamble Company (“P & G”). P & G appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff.
The case went to trial on two theories. First, plaintiff alleged that P & G negligently performed safety inspections at Buckeye and that, as the result of the allegedly negligent inspections, plaintiff’s decedent was killed. Second, plaintiff…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Beasley v. MacDonald Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- COLUMBIA ENGINEERING INTERN., LTD. v. EspeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stovall v. Universal Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Morris v. Merritt Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Ramirez v. Alabama Power Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
- Galloway v. OZARK STRIPING, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- McGUFFIE v. Mead Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.