Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Staples

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1989No. 87-1090PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff’s decedent was killed in an industrial accident involving a finishing line compactor operated on the premises of his employer, Buckeye Cellulose Corporation (“Buckeye”), a separately incorporated, wholly owned subsidiary of Procter & Gamble Company (“P & G”). P & G appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The case went to trial on two theories. First, plaintiff alleged that P & G negligently performed safety inspections at Buckeye and that, as the result of the allegedly negligent inspections, plaintiff’s decedent was killed. Second, plaintiff…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Beasley v. MacDonald Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. COLUMBIA ENGINEERING INTERN., LTD. v. EspeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stovall v. Universal Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Morris v. Merritt Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Ramirez v. Alabama Power Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
  4. Galloway v. OZARK STRIPING, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. McGUFFIE v. Mead Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API