Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Eisner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 23, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Mercure, J. P.
Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 14, 1997, which ruled that Hertz Corporation was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant.
Claimant was engaged by the Special Travel Agency Representative Service Network (hereinafter STARS), a marketing department operated by Hertz Corporation, to distribute travel brochures to travel agencies under the terms of a 1988 written agreement. In 1994, claimant filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits. Ultimately, the Unemployment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re the Claim of RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Dizak v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Claim of FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Khan v. GalvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of De PaivaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of WestneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Wiley v. HillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003