Legal Opinion
Wiley v. Hiller
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously vacated, determination confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in annulling respondent City Manager’s determination to terminate petitioner’s General Municipal Law § 207-a benefits on the ground that respondents should have commenced an action in Supreme *1025Court to terminate such benefits. “While the General Municipal Law does not provide an administrative framework for making disability determinations, courts have long recognized the appropriateness of administrative hearings for that purpose” (Matter of Giorgio v Bucci, 267 AD2d…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Furch v. BucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of EisnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of WestneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Giorgio v. BucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Correia v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Jordan v. DalyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- SARKIS, II, FREDERICK W. v. MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF, HUMAN SERVICESAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Sarkis v. Monroe County Department of Human ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Sarkis v. Monroe County Department of Human ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015