Legal Opinion

Hilde v. Dixon

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 1, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We have here another instance of prospecting among old tax titles for nuggets in the form of procedural flaws. See Devine v. Nantucket, ante 548 (1983).

On August 30,1935, the collector of taxes of Kingston made a tax taking of five lots which had belonged to Marks F. Braunecker. Rather than foreclosing the tax titles, the town applied to the Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation under the “lands of low value” procedure contained in G. L. c. 60, § § 79 and 80, as amended by St. 1935, c. 173, § 1 and 2, respectively. Those proceedings culminated on April 20,1939, in the grant of a deed of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Conners v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Norton v. WestMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. City of Boston v. Boston Port Development Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. City of Fall River v. Conanicut MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. BatchelderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Robertson v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  3. In Re StacyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
  4. Lamontagne v. KnightlyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API