Legal Opinion
United Power Ass'n v. Moxness
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 1978No. Civ. 9449PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
The appeal and cross-appeal from part of an order in an eminent domain proceeding (a consolidation of separate suits from Sargent and Richland Counties) involve awards of costs, fees (including attorney fees), and expenses to landowners (§§ 32-15-32 and 32-15-35, NDCC). Sums awarded as appraisal fees are not challenged. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The events which bear upon the principal dispute here are as follows:(1)Before January 1975
United Power Association and Cooperative Power Association (hereinafter UPA-CPA), Minnesota cooperative corporations…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Keyes v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, DENVER, COLO.District Court, D. Colorado · 1977
- City of Bismarck v. ThomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Atherton v. State Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State, by Head v. SavageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Klinger v. Adams County School District No. 50Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Gissel v. Kenmare TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Arneson v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Cassady v. Souris River Telephone CooperativeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- MDU v. BehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.