Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mahoney v. McKinnon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1880PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Douglas County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, J.:

It appears from the transcript that this was an action commenced in the circuit court for Douglas county, upon the relation of J. H. Mahoney, for usurpation of office, under section 354 of the Civil Code.

The amended complaint alleges: That the plaintiff, James H. Mahoney, private party, is a resident voter and taxpayer in the city of Oakland, Douglas county, Oregon; that on the fourteenth day of December, 1878, in Douglas county, Oregon, the defendants, without any legal right, usurped and intruded into the office of trustees of the city of Oakland, a public…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirk v. RhoadsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Peabody v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. People ex rel. Crawford v. MolitorMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carn v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Parks v. State ex rel. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Anderton v. KempeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Horning v. Board of Canvassers of Saginaw Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Cook v. FisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API