Maison Dorin Société Anonyme v. Arnold
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Appellant contends that under equity rule 57, after a cause has been dismissed under its terms, the District Court has no power to recall the parties, and no authority to hear a motion to vacate an order granted under said rule, without the permission of the Supreme Court of the United States, and bases its contention largely upon the apparently mandatory phrase “shall be dismissed” contained in said rule.
Equity rule 57 reads as follows:
“After a cause shall be placed on the trial calendar it may be passed over to another day of the same .term, by consent of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The PalmyraSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Henderson v. Carbondale Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corp. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bathgate v. . HaskinNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richard Chira v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- D. O. Haynes & Co. v. Druggists' CircularCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- (PC) Forster v. ClendeninDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Thomas v. EscobedoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Pollitzer v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930