Legal Opinion

Schwarz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1939No. 20048PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, Judge.

Appellant was indicted by the grand jury for keeping and exhibiting for the purpose of gaming a policy game, and was convicted therefor and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

We find no bills of exception in the record, but we do find a motion to quash the indictment because the same is alleged to be duplicitous because it alleges that appellant did keep and exhibit a policy game, thus alleging two separate and distinct offenses in its one and only count.

The general rule relative to duplicity in an indictment seems to be based on the proposition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kellogg v. Kansas Mercantile Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  3. Hammons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
  4. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. State v. CroninSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Steele v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API