Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kellogg v. Kansas Mercantile Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1891PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Original Proceeding in Quo Warranto. The opinion, filed on February 7, 1891, states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

*352The opinion of the court was delivered by

HoetoN, C. J.:

This action is brought under subdivisions 3 and 4 of ¶4767 of the General Statutes of 1889. It has for its object the forfeiture of the charter of the Kansas Mercantile Association, and the prevention of the individual defendants from acting as a corporation or exercising corporate rights. The charter states that the purpose for which the corporation was formed is to sell various articles of merchandise with premium numbers attached, the premium numbers entitling purchasers holding the same to a selection of other articles. The testimony…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hull v. . RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Wilkinson v. . GillNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. State v. MumfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  4. Governors of the Almshouse of New York v. . Am. Art UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  5. Commonwealth v. ThacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. FinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Higgins v. Cardinal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. FinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API