State v. Cronin
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel G. Taylor, Judge. (1) The indictment is insufficient and does not advise the defendant of the character of the accusation against him. It is indefinite and uncertain, and fails to define in what manner a “policy” was made or established, and fails to define what is meant by a “ policy. ’ ’ (2) The testimony is clearly insufficient to support the verdict or conviction.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel G. Taylor, Judge. (1) The indictment is insufficient and does not advise the defendant of the character of the accusation against him. It is indefinite and uncertain, and fails to define in what manner a “policy” was made or established, and fails to define what is meant by a “ policy. ’ ’ (2) The testimony is clearly insufficient to support the verdict or conviction. It is indefinite, uncertain, vague, and will not satisfy the court’s mind that the defendant is guilty of the offense charged in the indictment, or guilty of any other…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
At the February term, 1903, the grand jury of the city of St. Louis preferred an indictment against the defendant, the second count of which is in the following words:
“And the grand jurors aforesaid, upon their oath aforesaid, do further present and say that Frank Cronin and Louis Miller, late of the city aforesaid, on the fifteenth day of February, one thousand nine hundred and three, and at the city of St. Louis aforesaid, and State aforesaid, unlawfully and feloniously did aid and assist in making1 and establishing a ‘policy’ as a bus*666iness and avocation in the State of Missouri, against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DeWittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Stout v. CalverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1840
- Griffin v. SamuelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1839
- Davidson v. PeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1836
- State v. TobieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SausseleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- State v. CavinessSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State v. HiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.