Bickford v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
Under the reasoning of Smith v. Bates Technical College,1 Jerald Bickford was not required to exhaust his contractual or administrative remedies on his claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. He articulated violations of public policy under the City of Seattle’s Police Officer’s Bill of Rights. However, the trial court abused its discretion in ruling that the City of Seattle *811failed to plead its right to set off any disability award against the verdict.
FACTS
Bickford was a sergeant with the Seattle Police Department (Department). One of Bickford’s subordinates made several…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Flanigan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Smith v. Bates Technical CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Smith v. Bates Technical CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Cagle v. Burns and Roe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Henderson v. TyrrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lascheid v. City of KennewickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Estate Of Virgil Victor Becker, Jr., App. v. Forward Technology Industries, Inc., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Cogdell v. 1999 O'Ravez Family, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Erik T. Salisbury, Et Ano, V. City Of Seattle, Et AnoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- Cogdell v. 1999 O'RAVEZ FAMILY, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.