Moss v. Currie
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Ejectment.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson
This is an action of ejectment. The lessor read two patents, each covering the land in controversy — one to Young and Tibbs, issued in 1785; the other to Harvey, issued in 1787.
The defendants in the action (plaintiffs here,) claimed under a patent younger than either of the former ; had enclosed apart of the interference, between their grant and those of Harvey and of Young and Tibbs, more than twenty years prior to the institution of this suit, and retained the ground thus enclosed, without interruption, up to the trial.
But a prior possession of all the land embraced in Harvey’s patent, had…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fox v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1817
3Cited by9 opinions
- Potter v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Stephenson Lumber Co. v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Harrison v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
- Meade v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Chiles v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.