Legal Opinion

Harrison v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 31, 1834PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Circuit Court eor Christian County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

delivered the following Opinion

Judge Nicholas concurring — Judge Underwood dissenting^

This is an action of ejectment, in which the defendant succeeded, in consequence of an instruction given by the court to the jury, as to the construction and application of the statute of 1809, for the- speedy adjust-' *349merit of land claims, and for the protection of actual settlers. '

SíiSettlements on the land, of spactively!’ jllstnlct¡ons ¡„ the circuit ct., <luestum Doctrines now settled, viz: 1. One who euteredonland, in tending to take possession of the entire tract, no partofwhiohwas then held…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fox v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1817
  2. Moss v. CurrieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833
  3. Hord v. BodleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
  4. Millar v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1820
  5. Daniel v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Caughlin v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Kentucky Union Company v. HevnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1924
  3. Stephenson Lumber Co. v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Martin v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Ramsey v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API