Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Ingraham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1934No. 10089PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

An administrator of the estate of a deceased person was appointed in Richmond County. After partial administration, the heirs at law, some of whom resided within the State outside of Richmond County, and the only other one resided outside of the State, employed an attorney at law residing in Richmond County upon a contingent fee of one fourth of whatever he might recover in winding up the estate. Under such employment the attorney in the names of the heirs interposed objections to returns made by the administrator to the ordinary of Richmond County in February, 1923, and in August, 1924. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. GaissertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Ingraham v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Gaines v. GainesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Gaines v. GainesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Ingraham v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Georgia Money Corp. v. RissmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API