Legal Opinion
Ingraham v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 20, 1933No. 9269PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The answer must be in reply to the question as asked. This court has said that it is not required to look into the record to ascertain additional facts, but will merely answer the questions properly framed as they are stated. Hubbard v. Bibb Brokerage Co., 172 Ga. 520, 524. Georgian Co. v. Jones, 154 Ga. 762, 763.
The jurisdiction conferred upon the court of ordinary in citations for settlement, etc., “is statutory, not constitutional.” Echols v. Almon, 77 Ga. 330 (1 S. E. 269). The superior court on the trial of an appeal from the court of ordinary has no broader powers than the court of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lester v. TooleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Mohr-Weil Lumber Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Georgian Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Milner v. Mutual Benefit Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knowles v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Goodman v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Reynolds v. IngrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Goodman v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Ingraham v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933