Legal Opinion

Ghee v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

Lorraine Ghee (Claimant) petitions for review of the May 13,1996, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) 1 which affirmed a decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) who determined that, because Claimant failed to properly serve a copy of her claim petition on the University of Pennsylvania Hospital (Employer), Employer’s late answer was valid, and Claimant was entitled to benefits only for a closed period. We affirm on other grounds.

Claimant was employed as a pharmacy technician for Employer. On February 18, 1993, Claimant filed a claim petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Heraeus Electro Nite Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Manolovich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Abex Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Ross v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rite Aid Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Neidlinger v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Community Action Program of Evansville v. VeeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Washington v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API