Ghee v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FLAHERTY, Judge.
Lorraine Ghee (Claimant) petitions for review of the May 13,1996, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) 1 which affirmed a decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) who determined that, because Claimant failed to properly serve a copy of her claim petition on the University of Pennsylvania Hospital (Employer), Employer’s late answer was valid, and Claimant was entitled to benefits only for a closed period. We affirm on other grounds.
Claimant was employed as a pharmacy technician for Employer. On February 18, 1993, Claimant filed a claim petition…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Heraeus Electro Nite Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Manolovich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Abex Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Ross v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rite Aid Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Neidlinger v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Community Action Program of Evansville v. VeeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Washington v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.