Legal Opinion
Ross v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 1, 1992No. 2526 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
William Ross (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the referee which had denied Claimant’s claim and dismissed his appeal.
The relevant facts are as follows: Claimant had been employed as a maintenance electrician by Allied-Signal Corporation (Employer) from 1939 until his retirement on July 1,1985. On September 20, 1985, Claimant filed a claim petition under Section 301(c)(2) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 411(2). Claimant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Caggiano v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Bostic v. DREHERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Mrs. Smith Pie Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Bi-Lo Shop-N-Bag v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Heraeus Electro Nite Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Ghee v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Washington v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Golovich v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Hunter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998