Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 27, 1996No. 91-791VPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This action was brought by petitioners under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l to 300aa-34 (Supp. V 1993), to recover for injuries allegedly suffered by Patrice Seamon, petitioner, and daughter of petitioners Almedia and Joseph Freeman, as a result of a vaccine administration. Petitioners have filed, pro se, a “Motion to Reopen the Case,” which the court deems to be a request for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Rules for the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). After considering the Government’s opposition, filed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Frank Olle, Jr. Automatic Press Corporation and James W. Cato v. The Henry & Wright CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Young v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Curtis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Infiniti Information Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Mora v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Batish v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.