Legal Opinion

Diggan v. Cycle Sat, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 25, 1998No. 96-1318PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff Michael Diggan, a computer programmer, sued his former employer, defendant Cycle Sat, Inc., claiming it breached an implied contract to pay him for developing software, and breached an implied license for use of the software in its “cycle cypher,” a downlink system for capturing television commercials sent over satellite. The district court granted Cycle Sat summary judgment, finding the claims barred by the five-year limitation period of Iowa Code section 614.1(4) (1995). On Diggan’s appeal, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

I.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sandbulte v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Effects Associates, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Bob McKiness Excavating & Grading, Inc. v. Morton Buildings, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. Brown v. EllisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Ames Rental Property Ass'n v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  3. Westfield Insurance Companies v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. Krause v. KrauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Huerta-Orosco v. CosgroveDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API