Legal Opinion
Huerta-Orosco v. Cosgrove
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided October 30, 2013No. C12-4111-DEOPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before me on plaintiffs October 7, 2013, motion (Doc. No. 19) for leave to file a first amended complaint. Defendant has filed a resistance (Doc. No. 21). Neither party has requested oral argument and, in any event, I find that oral argument is not necessary. See N.D. Ia. L.R. 7(c). The motion is fully submitted.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Mariano Huerta-Orosco commenced this action on December 18, 2012, by filing a pro se motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a proposed complaint. Doc. Nos. 1 and 1-1.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Popoalii v. Correctional Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Lachonne Bell v. Allstate Life Insurance Company Sears Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Christy v. MiulliSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Brown v. EllisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Millwright v. RomerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- TSB Holdings, L.L.C. and 911 N. Governor, L.L.C. v. City of Iowa City, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Roberts v. The Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020
- Wojtarowicz v. University of ArkansasDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022