Legal Opinion
Dismuke v. Miller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 6, 1959No. 38085Published
1Opinion of the Court
344 P.2d 1049 (1959)
Billy Edward DISMUKE and Hale-Halsell Co., a corporation, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
George R. MILLER, Defendant in Error.
No. 38085.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
October 6, 1959.
Sanders & McElroy, Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.
Robert N. Wilde, Tulsa, Rucker, Tabor & Cox, Joseph A. Sharp, O.H. (Pat) O'Neal, Tulsa, for defendant in error.
JACKSON, Justice.
In the trial court the plaintiff, George R. Miller, sought recovery for damages allegedly caused by defendants, Billy Edward Dismuke and Hale-Halsell Company, a corporation, when plaintiff's vehicle was struck from the rear by a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Negrate v. GunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Rein v. PattonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Cabiniss v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Dippel v. HargraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Pawhuska v. ExendineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.