Legal Opinion

Bellam v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 7, 1964No. [No. 175, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

The appellant was convicted by the court without a jury under indictments in seven distinct cases of breaking and entering, with intent to commit a felony in six cases and of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor in the seventh. These appeals are from three of the convictions, in which the sentences were six years each to run consecutively, thus imposing a total sentence of eighteen years.

The first question raised concerns the legality of the search of the appellant’s home and the seizure therein of certain tools offered in evidence. The facts are virtually undisputed. The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  2. Lester v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. McCray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. In Re Anthony F.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API