Legal Opinion

United States v. Jacksonville Paper Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided April 23, 1948No. 7579; Entry No. J-90, etcPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

These are applications by the collector for review of a decision of the trial court sustaining the claim of the importer that *426the invoiced values, less certain charges, represented the dutiable export value of the merchandise. Jacksonville Paper Co. v. United States, 18 Cust. Ct. 362, Reap. Dec. 6832. Appellant claims that the appraised values, based on foreign value, are the correct dutiable values.

The merchandise herein, described in the invoices as “M. G. Sulphate Wrapping Paper,” was exported from Finland between August 16, 1938, and July 20, 1939. It was entered under duress…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noonan v. Caledonia Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. New England Fish Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Agruba Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  4. Solari v. Uunited StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  5. Jacksonville Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heyman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API