Agruba Trading Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lawbencb, Judge:
Three appeals for reappraisement filed by the importer were consolidated and tried as one case below.
Near the close of the trial the Government moved —
* * * to dismiss the importer’s appeal for reappraisement upon the ground * * * that the exporter has testified that the invoice does not contain a statement of the currency in which this merchandise was bought and sold, and hence it is not a compliance with the provisions of section 481 of the Tariff Act of 1930 * * *.
We assume that, although the motion was addressed to the “appeal” in the singular form, it was meant to relate…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. LeggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- New England Fish Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fergus Imported Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Florea & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
- United States v. Jacksonville Paper Co.United States Customs Court · 1948
- C. Pappas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Mitchell Shipping & Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945