Legal Opinion

Heyman Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 1, 1962No. Reap. Dec. 10157; Entry Nos. 726378; 745184; 752531PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Tbe three appeals for reappraisement herein involved have been consolidated for purposes of trial. They relate to several importations of so-called sisal pads, which are, in fact, composed wholly of henequen fiber. The pads in issue were manufactured by Progress Padding Co., S.A., of Merida, Yucatan, Mexico (hereinafter called Progress), and were exported to the United States during August and September 1955. They were appraised on the basis of the statutory export value of similar merchandise (§ 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930)1 produced by Cordeleria Santa Ines, S.A., of Merida, *534Yucata…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. International Commercial Co.United States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Steer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Hornung v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. International Commercial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Heyman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Heyman Co.United States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API