Perpich v. United States Department of Defense
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
In this opinion, we address a challenge to the constitutionality of the Montgomery Amendment, which restricts the power of state governors to withhold consent to federal deployment of the National Guard of the United States. We hold that the Constitution does not require gubernatorial consent to active duty for training of the National Guard of the United States. Based on the statutory system of dual enlistment and the relationship between the Constitution’s army and militia clauses, we find the Montgomery Amendment to be a constitutional exercise of congressional power.
I
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Tarble's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Cox v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Watson v. Arkansas National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Games v. CavazosDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Hazelton v. State Personnel CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Uhl v. SwanstromDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Yount v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.