Legal Opinion

Boston Edison Company v. Campanella & Cardi Construction Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 30, 1959No. 5520_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is a diversity action brought by plaintiff-appellant Boston Edison Company, hereinafter sometimes called Edison, to recover for damage to two transmission poles resulting from construction work done by the defendant contractor, hereinafter called Campanella, pursuant to a contract with the Department of Public Works of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Jurisdiction adequately appeared. The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts, which included a stipulation eliminating all questions of pleading. The Court dismissed the complaint, and Edison appealed.

It…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Delano v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Aldworth v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Peabody v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Morse v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Young v. City of ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  2. Murray Realty, Inc. v. Berke Moore Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Rooney v. ONE 1977 SUBARU TWO DOOR, VIN A26L-910, 450Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Imperial Corp. of America v. Frenchman's Creek Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Benjamin A. Stratmore and Helen Stratmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API