Boston Edison Company v. Campanella & Cardi Construction Company
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is a diversity action brought by plaintiff-appellant Boston Edison Company, hereinafter sometimes called Edison, to recover for damage to two transmission poles resulting from construction work done by the defendant contractor, hereinafter called Campanella, pursuant to a contract with the Department of Public Works of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Jurisdiction adequately appeared. The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts, which included a stipulation eliminating all questions of pleading. The Court dismissed the complaint, and Edison appealed.
It…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Delano v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Aldworth v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Peabody v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Morse v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Young v. City of ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
- Murray Realty, Inc. v. Berke Moore Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Rooney v. ONE 1977 SUBARU TWO DOOR, VIN A26L-910, 450Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Imperial Corp. of America v. Frenchman's Creek Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Benjamin A. Stratmore and Helen Stratmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.