Legal Opinion
Young v. City of Providence
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided February 11, 2004No. C.A.01-288MLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LISI, District Judge.
On November 7, 2003, this Court issued an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on counsel for plaintiff, Barry C. Scheck, Nick Brustin and Robert B. Mann. 1 That order addressed statements attributed to this Court as set forth in a memorandum of law which was filed by plaintiffs counsel on October 16, 2003. The memorandum was signed and, therefore, certified pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 by Mr. Scheck, Mr. Brustin, and Mr. Mann. On December 15, 2003, the three respondent counsel appeared before this Court in response to the show cause…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. TeeterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- T I Federal Credit Union v. DelBonisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Young v. City of Providence ex rel. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Young v. City of Providence Ex Rel. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Young v. City Of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Harris v. City of Providence, 05-1247 (r.I.super. 2006)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Scheck v. City of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005