Legal Opinion · Dissent

Benjamin A. Stratmore and Helen Stratmore v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 29, 1970No. 17786Published

1DissentStahl, Circuit Judge

While I agree with the majority that the decision of the district court should not be affirmed, I must dissent from the outright holding that the taxpayers are not entitled to a business bad debt deduction under § 166 of the Internal Revenue Code.1 As discussed later, I believe appellees should be afforded an opportunity to be relieved of a stipulation clearly insufficient and improvident.

According to the Treasury Regulations,2 a full deduction based on a *466loss from a bad debt is proper only where the loss is proximately related to a trade or business of the taxpayer. Therefore, where a bad…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Logan Lumber Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. I. Hal Millsap, Jr., and Frances Millsap v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. John M. Trent and Lisa M. Trent v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. George P. Weddle and Bertha R. (Terris) Weddle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API