Legal Opinion
State v. Wade
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 5, 2017No. AC38719PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.
The defendant, Sidney Wade, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that his resentencing did not give rise to a double jeopardy violation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural history is relevant to the present claim. Following a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of two counts of sale of narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b), two counts of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennsylvania v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PecorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. MitchellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018