Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Vargo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 2018No. 105525PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY A. JONES, SR., J.:

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we consider the second case initiated by plaintiffs-appellants, Simon and Bettina Montgomery, relative to their purchase of a home from defendant-appellee, Donald Vargo. Vargo filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground of res judicata, and the trial court granted the motion. In their sole assignment of error, the Montgomerys contend that the trial court committed reversible error in granting Vargo's motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

{¶ 2} The record demonstrates that the Montgomerys purchased the home,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Duncan v. City of Mentor City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hollins v. ShafferOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patricia Adams, et al. v. The Medical Protective Company Inc., et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  2. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. BrennerOhio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Weber v. MTH Real Estate, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API