Legal Opinion

People v. Dixon

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1892No. 20880PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and appeals from the judgment, upon a bill of exceptions. Counsel for appellant relies upon many alleged errors of law committed by the trial court for a reversal of the judgment. The assignments of *257error, based upon the orders of the court refusing to set aside the information, resetting the case for trial, and denying the application for a continuance, are not well taken. The court committed no error in admitting the evidence of the witness Buckmaster as to the statement of Otis Dixon, made in the absence of the defendant. Otis Dixon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. People v. LeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. People v. SamarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. PlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. State v. RaderOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. People v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. State v. BuralliNevada Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API