Matteo v. Sharon Hill Lanes, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jacobs, J.,
In this negligence action the jury returned a verdict of $5000 for the plaintiff. Defendant’s motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial were refused and defendant appeals. We will grant a new trial.
Plaintiff was injured while bowling on defendant’s lanes. He fell because of a wet spot on his shoe which prevented him from sliding as he threw the ball toward the pins. In the course of his own testimony the plaintiff admitted that he did not inspect his shoes prior to bowling the frame in which he fell. He also stated that he knew coffee and sandwiches were being…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crane v. NealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Brown v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Nelson v. Barclay Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Criner v. GrecoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
3Cited by14 opinions
- McCullough v. Monroeville Home Ass'n, Post 820, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Calhoun v. Jersey Shore HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Wescoat v. Northwest Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Goldmas v. Acme Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- City of Pittsburgh v. JodzisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.