Sparks v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MOYLAN, Judge.
The entrapment defense is as modern as Abscam. 1 It is as ancient as the Book of Genesis: “The serpent beguiled me and I did eat.” 2 On the merits, it seldom enjoys any more success today than it did in the Garden of Eden. 3 As a generative source of appellate litigation, however, it has been perennially luxuriant.
Although pioneered in the state courts, 4 it first achieved high-profile recognition in 1932 with the Supreme Court decision of Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed.2d 413. Sorrells and progeny, notwithstanding non-constitutional status, have…
2Cases cited99 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Skrivanek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Graham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Kamara v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- State v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.