Legal Opinion

Sparks v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 6, 1992No. 788, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

The entrapment defense is as modern as Abscam. 1 It is as ancient as the Book of Genesis: “The serpent beguiled me and I did eat.” 2 On the merits, it seldom enjoys any more success today than it did in the Garden of Eden. 3 As a generative source of appellate litigation, however, it has been perennially luxuriant.

Although pioneered in the state courts, 4 it first achieved high-profile recognition in 1932 with the Supreme Court decision of Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed.2d 413. Sorrells and progeny, notwithstanding non-constitutional status, have…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Skrivanek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Graham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Kamara v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. State v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API