Legal Opinion

Skrivanek v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 12, 1999No. 146, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a drug conviction. The appellant contends that the trial court erred by submitting the case to the jury on lesser included, but not expressly charged, attempt offenses. The appellant also argues that the police violated due process by the manner in which they conducted the reverse sting operation leading to the appellant’s arrest and that the court improperly admitted evidence of other crimes. For the reasons set forth below, we shall affirm.

Corporal Robert Shelley (Shelley) of the Maryland State Police was working in an undercover capacity with the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. United States v. Bobby Ray MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. State v. MontoyaMontana Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Merritt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Wilder v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Hawthorne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Kamara v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API