Legal Opinion

Ferrell v. Broadway.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 22, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ÜN PETITION for re-bearing.

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY and DOUGLAS, JJ., dissenting. This is a petition to rehear this case, which is reported in126 N.C. 258. The proceeding is a motion in the cause to set aside a judgment rendered at August Term, 1887, of LENOIR. The Judge found as facts: That in 1883 an action was bought by W. B. Ferrell and others (among whom are all the movers herein) to have E. S. Broadway, who had in 1880 bought a tract of land at foreclosure sale, declared a trustee for the plaintiffs in that action. The movers herein were parties-plaintiff therein, and, being minors, were represented by their next friend, W. B.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vick v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Williamson v. . HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Ferrell v. . BroadwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Leduc v. . SlocombSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Branch v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LascaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Rector Ex Rel. Rector v. Laurel River Logging Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Keller v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Keller v. Caldwell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Caine ex rel. Cavanaugh v. Victor Lamp Co.Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API