Leduc v. . Slocomb
Supreme Court of North Carolina
MotioN to set aside judgment, beard before Bynum, J., at November Term, 1898, of Oumbebland Superior Court.' Motion disallowed, and defendant appealed. Tbe facts found by bis Honor are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Eairoloth, O. J.
Tbe law of tbis case must be applicable to tbe following facts: Tbis cause coming to be beard, upon motion of defendant, Slocomb, to set aside tbe judgment obtained in tbe action, tbe matter being beard upon affidavits submitted by both sides, tbe Court finds tbe following facts:
1. That summons issued, returnable to tbe January Term, 1891, of tbe Superior Court of said county, on tbe 11th day of December, 1890, and was duly served on December 15th, 1890.
2. Tbe action was brought upon a note for $390, dated March 15, 1889, due thirty days after date, with interest at eight per…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vick v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Mauney v. . GidneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Kincaid v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
3Cited by15 opinions
- Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Cahoon v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Cahoon v. . BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- State v. . TruesdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Stockton v. Wolverine Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.