Smith v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
1. The plaintiff’s right to proceed against the defendant Randall was terminated by the final judgment against him (Smith v. Robinson, 212 Ga. 761, 762, 95 S. E. 2d 798), for a recovery of the amounts paid Randall by the plaintiff. A judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive between the parties as to -all matters in issue, or which under the rules of law- might have been put in issue until such judgment is reversed or set aside. Code §§ 110-501, 38-623, 3-607; Sumner v. Sumner, 186 Ga. 390 (197 S. E. 833); Hubbard v. Whatley, 200 Ga. 751 (38 S. E. 2d 738);…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Gibson v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Yablon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Rawson v. BrosnanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Shaw v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Jones v. Central Builders Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Cowsert v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962