Legal Opinion

Smith v. Garrison

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1923No. 3040PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cüriam.

The suit, after the allowance of amendments, consisted of two counts. The first count was against the defendant as administratrix, and charged waste, mismanagement, and wanton and fraudulent misappropriation of funds of the estate. The prayers of the first count were for an injunction to prevent the administratrix from selling or disposing of any of the property of the estate, for a receiver, and for general relief. The second count was against the defendant individually. It denied that the defendant had ever been administratrix of the estate; charged that her purported appointment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hart v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  2. Roberts v. Atlanta Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Smith v. ArdisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  4. Carey v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  5. Rogers v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. McCord v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. England v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Butler v. FloydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Coppedge v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API